The Raptor Pit: SuperPi 32m - The Raptor Pit

Jump to content

  • (3 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic
SuperPi 32m Scores listed on 1st post

#41 User is offline   road-runner 

  • Geek Geek
  • Group: Elite
  • Posts: 1,470
  • Joined: 15-May 07
  • Location:Conroe, Texas

Posted 11 January 2010 - 07:57 PM

7min 5sec 703ms http://hwbot.org/res...resultId=939085
i7-980X, Classified 760, 4-5870s, 6Gb Corsair GT
Posted Image


Temp Database-Player Registration-Rules-Forum Wars Calculator
0

#42 User is offline   miahallen 

  • Tweaked Geek
  • Group: Elite
  • Posts: 558
  • Joined: 15-May 08
  • Gender:Male

Posted 23 January 2010 - 01:28 AM

6:57.3 with W3580
The post counter is not an intelligence meter!

Posted Image

Heat Team IRONMODS
0

#43 User is offline   miahallen 

  • Tweaked Geek
  • Group: Elite
  • Posts: 558
  • Joined: 15-May 08
  • Gender:Male

Posted 17 March 2010 - 06:19 PM

6m 26s 593ms - SuperPI 32M submission at the bot
The post counter is not an intelligence meter!

Posted Image

Heat Team IRONMODS
0

#44 User is offline   miahallen 

  • Tweaked Geek
  • Group: Elite
  • Posts: 558
  • Joined: 15-May 08
  • Gender:Male

Posted 20 May 2010 - 10:51 PM

OK, I was already out in front by a long shot, but heres one even better ;)

6:07.844 with 980X @ 6.2GHz :)

http://hwbot.org/com...6min_7sec_844ms
The post counter is not an intelligence meter!

Posted Image

Heat Team IRONMODS
0

#45 User is offline   hokiealumnus 

  • Forum Wars Judge
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 6,012
  • Joined: 07-January 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Raleigh, NC

Posted 10 June 2010 - 11:36 AM

8:59.203 (HWBot) Personal best for this one too. :)
My most recent review: AMD HD 6970 Graphics Card Review | Miss a review? Check out the full list here.

Posted Image
0

#46 User is offline   Inteller 

  • Grand Master Geek
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Banned
  • Posts: 4,632
  • Joined: 10-August 09
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Location:USA

Posted 30 July 2010 - 04:48 AM

08:03.771

Posted Image
0

#47 User is offline   dejo 

  • Major Geek
  • Group: Elite
  • Posts: 182
  • Joined: 19-July 10
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tyler, Tx

Posted 29 August 2010 - 06:47 PM

here is my bot submission for supi32m 6:50.110 on the 920

My link
0

#48 User is offline   Inteller 

  • Grand Master Geek
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Banned
  • Posts: 4,632
  • Joined: 10-August 09
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Location:USA

Posted 31 August 2010 - 02:55 AM

7:58.671

http://www.hwbot.org...min_58sec_671ms
0

#49 User is offline   theoldtimer 

  • Xtreme Geek
  • Group: Elite
  • Posts: 478
  • Joined: 07-December 09
  • Gender:Male

Posted 12 May 2011 - 07:05 PM

6m 06.507s Sandy Bridge. I should be able to do a little better with the Sandy Bridge in this bench test, maybe after I find what it wants the time will improve?

Posted Image
0

#50 User is offline   hokiealumnus 

  • Forum Wars Judge
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 6,012
  • Joined: 07-January 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Raleigh, NC

Posted 12 May 2011 - 10:50 PM

Ooo...somebody either got lucky or has been binning like a madman for a 57x chip. Congrats oldtimer, and nice time!

Methinks it wants XP. :)
My most recent review: AMD HD 6970 Graphics Card Review | Miss a review? Check out the full list here.

Posted Image
0

#51 User is offline   theoldtimer 

  • Xtreme Geek
  • Group: Elite
  • Posts: 478
  • Joined: 07-December 09
  • Gender:Male

Posted 13 May 2011 - 06:19 AM

View Posthokiealumnus, on 12 May 2011 - 10:50 PM, said:

Ooo...somebody either got lucky or has been binning like a madman for a 57x chip. Congrats oldtimer, and nice time!

Methinks it wants XP. :)

Thanks hokie. It's the same chip I've been testing just a different MB. This UD7 will let the chip boot at X58 with the BCLK underclocked, same MHz wall though. I've not spent a lot of time on SPi-32m with the Sandy Bridge but for whatever reason it didn't like XP full or stripped down? Funny thing is this is a very old very dirty Win 7 64-bit install but it just kills the XP SPi 32m times? Now SPi 1m is a very different story as XP wins every time hands down. If I can ever find what this chip wants I hope to run in the high 5 minute range in SPi 32m. I may try a fresh OS install next. So far my Asus M4E have scored better in most every bench test compared to this UD7?

Of course the testing isn't over so I'll see how it works out. I may be missing something? :idontknow:

X58 boot and Windows load
Posted Image
0

#52 User is offline   hokiealumnus 

  • Forum Wars Judge
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 6,012
  • Joined: 07-January 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Raleigh, NC

Posted 13 May 2011 - 08:25 AM

The only thing the UD7 should do better at is 3DMark01. Everything else the M4E will likely do better.

I hear you about XP. I've been struggling with 32M on XP too, but have been told it's better. My best time is still under Win7, but I'll be working on it once my rig is back up & running (pump croaked).

With the multipliers available to you, put that thing on DICE or SS (I forget whether you have one). Hopefully it will unlock the MHz to go with the multi. :)
My most recent review: AMD HD 6970 Graphics Card Review | Miss a review? Check out the full list here.

Posted Image
0

#53 User is offline   hokiealumnus 

  • Forum Wars Judge
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 6,012
  • Joined: 07-January 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Raleigh, NC

Posted 13 May 2011 - 09:44 AM

Definitely the wrong link. I've beaten it by a long shot now though.

6:14.869 - 2600K @ 5536MHz
My most recent review: AMD HD 6970 Graphics Card Review | Miss a review? Check out the full list here.

Posted Image
0

#54 User is offline   theoldtimer 

  • Xtreme Geek
  • Group: Elite
  • Posts: 478
  • Joined: 07-December 09
  • Gender:Male

Posted 13 May 2011 - 07:19 PM

View PostTheWolf, on 13 May 2011 - 08:37 AM, said:

Hokie your blow link is to the wrong time? No way you ran a 8second 32m. :P :hysterical: ;)



Edit: Oldtimer I been feeling the same about muti & SB that the motherboard could very well be the hold back for some SB chips.
I should have a different MB in a few days "Tuesday" we'll see. ;) BTW nice chip!

The strange thing about it is even though I can boot X58 with the UD7 this chip will run 20MHz faster in the Asus M4E. The way it stacks up (so far) using the same 2600K the UD7 is bench stable (most 2D/3D bench tests) @5680-5694MHz while the M4E is bench stable @5710-5720MHz. It is still early in the UD7 testing though.
TheWolf the way I see it I've had four of these Sandy Bridge MB's 2 UD7's and two M4E's and even though one MB may do the clocks differently than the other, the Processor will have a MHz wall that so far I haven't found a way around. In other words so far what was max CPU speed in one MB was pretty much the same in the other +/- a few MHz. I found that getting it cold -45/-50C does help with max speed at least during my testing.


View Posthokiealumnus, on 13 May 2011 - 09:44 AM, said:

Definitely the wrong link. I've beaten it by a long shot now though.

6:14.869 - 2600K @ 5536MHz

Nice score hokie.


I did improve my time a little bit today. I did a fresh install of Windows 7 32-bit less drivers or windows updates but none the less a full version on Win 7. Oh yeah, I bench these under a SS.

6m 01.905s SPI 32m Sandy Bridge I didn't break into the 5's but I will soon I think.
Posted Image
0

#55 User is offline   theoldtimer 

  • Xtreme Geek
  • Group: Elite
  • Posts: 478
  • Joined: 07-December 09
  • Gender:Male

Posted 14 May 2011 - 02:21 PM

5m 59.908s Sandy Bridge
Posted Image
0

#56 User is offline   theoldtimer 

  • Xtreme Geek
  • Group: Elite
  • Posts: 478
  • Joined: 07-December 09
  • Gender:Male

Posted 14 May 2011 - 03:34 PM

View PostTheWolf, on 14 May 2011 - 03:03 PM, said:

:nicescore: :kneel: :fwa: :respekt:

Thanks, dropping those last two seconds didn't come easy :cartoon3:
0

#57 User is offline   hokiealumnus 

  • Forum Wars Judge
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 6,012
  • Joined: 07-January 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Raleigh, NC

Posted 15 May 2011 - 11:55 AM

Stellar run oldtimer, you made it sub-six. Very impressive!!

Not to shabby yourself Wolfie. :dtup:
My most recent review: AMD HD 6970 Graphics Card Review | Miss a review? Check out the full list here.

Posted Image
0

#58 User is offline   theoldtimer 

  • Xtreme Geek
  • Group: Elite
  • Posts: 478
  • Joined: 07-December 09
  • Gender:Male

Posted 15 May 2011 - 08:53 PM

View Posthokiealumnus, on 15 May 2011 - 11:55 AM, said:

Stellar run oldtimer, you made it sub-six. Very impressive!!

Not to shabby yourself Wolfie. :dtup:

Thanks hokie. It didn't give it up easily but I finally found the right combination. :evileyes:
0

#59 User is offline   MetalRacer 

  • Xtreme Geek
  • Group: Elite
  • Posts: 225
  • Joined: 03-January 09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Lone Star State

Posted 24 December 2011 - 03:40 PM

6min 33sec 183ms


http://www.hwbot.org...min_33sec_183ms
ASUS Rampage IV Extreme / i7 3930k / G.Skill 4x4GB 2133 / Corsair AX1200
ASUS Maximus V Extreme / i7 2600k / G.Skill 2x4GB 2133 / ASUS GTX580 TOP / Corsair TX850

Posted Image
0

Share this topic:


  • (3 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users